jonadb: it would Be More Secure to build a custom encryption but both the lock and key will always be present at the clients side and the script h…

If you will do it in C++ you should implement it using the SDK. There is no need and no advantage of using an .EXE file. Indeed, there could be securi…

I know you are not asking to crack anything, but to understand how vulnerable the .MSE encryption is. Neither are we offering to crack anything, in fi…

.MSE encryption was broken years ago. Nowadays a 10 years old kid can do it. But you can implement our own encryption extension in C++.

I have a friend that can do it in 45 seconds and $15. But he doesn’t crack software. Who else?

Ohhh, those valuable friends.

Is this a hypothetical or real situation? You are an experienced developer, so let’s think this is a hypothetical situation for others that may be re…

denisT: I think a level of protection should depends on a price of the software you want to cell. If I cell 1000 bucks software I should be OK to an…

The issue seems to be solved in Max 2017. I get these values for the code of post #7 time:313 heap:3808304L time:138 heap:6800848L

denisT: the system allocates memory kinda strange for me… as you can see ‘copy’ makes a ‘copy’ of pointers to structure properties, but not a copy o…

See these examples. I would assume both would use the same (or close) memory footprint, but they don’t. ( struct struct1 ( a=[0,0,0], b=[0,0,0], …

I’ve tested with bigger structures, which do not create any of the values that leaks, but have several functions, and they don’t leak. The used heap i…

The value that leaks is the point3 (x_axis in this case). I guess point2, color, point4, matrix, etc. all would also leak. If you can have these cons…

Can you close the rollout after running the code?